Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:33:37 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | PublicNode | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Score | 99.4 | 94.9 | 0.0 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Poor |
| Availability | 99.98% | 100.00% | 0.00% |
| p50 latency | 20.2 ms | 25.5 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 33.4 ms | 50.6 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 65.7 ms | 113.2 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% | not measured |
| Head lag | 0.48 blocks | 0.48 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 1,560 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,015 | 9,080 | 1,789 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsPublicNode
+4.5points
- Latency+4.5
- Availability−0.0
- Head freshness−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +4.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
Tenderlyvs1RPC
+99.4points
- Availability+40.0
- Latency*+30.0
- Correctness*+20.0
- Head freshness*+9.4
The parts add to +99.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.