Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:15:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCBlast API1RPC
Rank1358
Score99.490.684.258.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.94%99.99%76.33%
p50 latency19.2 ms33.2 ms103.4 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency32.8 ms69.7 ms117.3 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency72.2 ms167.2 ms145.0 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.38 blocks0.41 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited027711,438
Unsupported0000
Samples8,4808,3818,4572,008

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.8points

  • Latency+8.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+15.2points

  • Latency+15.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.7points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.5
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time