Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:41:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkle1RPC
Rank2368
Score96.092.378.562.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms106.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency54.4 ms71.9 ms196.2 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency780.5 ms168.1 ms243.3 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited064116,92218,086
Unsupported002050
Samples105,368103,63124,40222,130

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+3.7points

  • Latency+3.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.4points

  • Latency+17.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.5points

  • Latency+26.6
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time