Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:38:54 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2378
Score96.892.077.562.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.94%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms119.2 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency49.8 ms71.9 ms210.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency733.8 ms170.3 ms234.0 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0660319,479
Unsupported0000
Samples113,398111,534113,18123,721

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.8points

  • Latency+5.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.4points

  • Latency+19.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.4points

  • Latency+27.5
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time