Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:15:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.499.190.658.7
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability100.00%99.99%99.94%76.33%
p50 latency19.2 ms17.2 ms33.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency32.8 ms34.2 ms69.7 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency72.2 ms84.8 ms167.2 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.48 blocks0.38 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited00271,438
Unsupported0000
Samples8,4808,5798,3812,008

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Availability+0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.8points

  • Latency+8.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.7points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.5
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time