Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:38:50 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank2568
Score96.884.878.462.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms105.1 ms106.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency49.8 ms122.6 ms195.5 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency733.8 ms147.6 ms242.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.49 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,21418,21119,479
Unsupported002230
Samples113,395112,81126,28923,721

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+12.1points

  • Latency+12.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.4points

  • Latency+18.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.4points

  • Latency+27.5
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time