Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.5 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:27:45 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2678
Score95.078.777.962.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.98%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms106.5 ms118.5 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency61.1 ms195.7 ms209.2 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency824.9 ms244.4 ms232.6 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited015,321216,344
Unsupported018600
Samples95,26822,01895,09620,132

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+16.2points

  • Latency+16.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.1points

  • Latency+17.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+32.4points

  • Latency+25.6
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +32.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time