Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:56:23 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2478
Score96.287.777.662.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.83%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.4 ms118.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency53.0 ms100.0 ms209.8 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency769.8 ms126.0 ms233.5 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.35 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited00318,435
Unsupported0000
Samples107,385105,575107,18222,529

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+8.5points

  • Latency+8.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+18.6points

  • Latency+18.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.8points

  • Latency+26.8
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time