Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:11:04 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeReal1RPC
Rank1248
Score99.497.986.658.0
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.99%100.00%74.55%
p50 latency19.2 ms20.8 ms87.4 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency33.1 ms40.7 ms100.0 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency75.4 ms100.2 ms129.7 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.34 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0006,444
Unsupported0000
Samples37,52437,88836,9537,742

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.5points

  • Latency+1.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.8points

  • Latency+13.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.4points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.2
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time