Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:58:30 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCBlast API
Rank1235
Score99.498.590.683.8
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.97%99.92%99.99%
p50 latency19.3 ms19.7 ms34.0 ms105.8 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms38.3 ms72.1 ms122.3 ms
p99 latency77.0 ms89.5 ms173.5 ms148.6 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited00150344
Unsupported0000
Samples38,78839,16838,20838,606

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.9points

  • Latency+0.9
  • Availability+0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.8points

  • Latency+8.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+15.6points

  • Latency+15.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time