Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:12:03 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMerkleCloudflare
Rank168
Score99.470.050.6
StatusExcellentDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%100.00%23.07%
p50 latency19.1 ms105.3 ms13.3 ms
p95 latency31.7 ms194.3 ms74.7 ms
p99 latency66.4 ms228.0 ms116.8 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.61 blocksno cohort
Rate limited01,3217
Unsupported014251
Samples8,4831,9178,431

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+29.4points

  • Latency+29.3
  • Head freshness+0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+48.9points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+11.9
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +48.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time