Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:45:23 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker
Rank1237
Score99.499.288.069.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.95%99.93%99.91%
p50 latency19.4 ms18.7 ms31.6 ms119.8 ms
p95 latency32.7 ms33.3 ms66.2 ms208.7 ms
p99 latency68.9 ms123.5 ms159.5 ms226.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.36 blocks0.42 blocks
Rate limited00401
Unsupported0000
Samples9,3979,3119,1689,301

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+11.4points

  • Latency+11.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time