Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:18:22 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.499.188.369.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.99%99.98%99.93%100.00%
p50 latency19.1 ms18.5 ms31.4 ms105.3 ms
p95 latency31.8 ms32.7 ms64.2 ms196.0 ms
p99 latency67.3 ms105.1 ms159.2 ms228.8 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.36 blocks0.61 blocks
Rate limited00391,358
Unsupported00014
Samples8,6588,5828,4451,968

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+11.1points

  • Latency+11.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+29.5points

  • Latency+29.3
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time