Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:15:34 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodedRPCMerkle1RPC
Rank2368
Score98.790.377.858.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.99%99.87%100.00%76.33%
p50 latency17.1 ms33.5 ms105.8 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.4 ms70.3 ms193.2 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency93.2 ms172.9 ms229.0 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.98%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.45 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0321,3381,434
Unsupported00190
Samples8,5968,3841,8972,003

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+8.4points

  • Latency+8.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+40.0points

  • Latency+29.3
  • Availability+9.5
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time