Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:16:22 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeMerkle1RPC
Rank1268
Score99.498.777.758.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.99%100.00%76.33%
p50 latency19.0 ms17.1 ms105.8 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency32.3 ms35.4 ms193.2 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency70.5 ms93.0 ms229.0 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.45 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited001,3451,439
Unsupported00190
Samples8,5168,6181,9042,008

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.7points

  • Latency+0.7
  • Availability+0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.7points

  • Latency+21.7
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.7points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.5
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time