Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:12:40 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeReal1RPC
Rank1248
Score99.499.286.159.0
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.99%99.99%76.94%
p50 latency18.6 ms17.4 ms86.8 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency32.2 ms33.2 ms98.4 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency68.0 ms80.7 ms116.9 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.33 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0001,424
Unsupported0000
Samples8,4198,5158,3231,990

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.3points

  • Latency+13.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +13.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.4points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.2
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time