Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:15:57 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.499.191.258.5
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%99.92%75.73%
p50 latency18.4 ms19.8 ms34.1 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms36.8 ms69.2 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency74.0 ms212.4 ms171.4 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited001256,462
Unsupported0000
Samples37,98637,68837,0997,759

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+8.2points

  • Latency+8.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+40.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time