Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:15:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.493.993.762.6
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.97%99.96%99.93%85.50%
p50 latency18.3 ms19.9 ms34.0 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms70.9 ms72.6 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency70.4 ms874.7 ms169.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.51 blocks0.36 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0056414,895
Unsupported0000
Samples87,50486,85185,41618,470

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+5.5points

  • Latency+5.5
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+5.7points

  • Latency+5.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+36.8points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +36.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time