Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:13:13 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.498.489.958.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.99%99.99%99.84%76.33%
p50 latency18.9 ms17.2 ms34.3 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency32.0 ms36.7 ms72.7 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency71.5 ms102.0 ms179.4 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.98%96.63%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.49 blocks0.39 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited00291,422
Unsupported0000
Samples8,4218,5308,3141,990

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.0points

  • Latency+1.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +1.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.5points

  • Latency+9.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.7points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.5
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time