Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:59:16 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1278
Score99.498.076.957.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.99%99.93%73.97%
p50 latency19.3 ms20.7 ms121.3 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency33.8 ms40.7 ms212.6 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency75.3 ms97.5 ms235.3 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0036,670
Unsupported0000
Samples38,83339,20238,7788,001

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.4points

  • Latency+1.4
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.5points

  • Latency+22.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.6points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.4
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time