Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 11:49:23 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeReal1RPC
Rank1248
Score99.499.186.458.2
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.97%100.00%74.93%
p50 latency19.4 ms19.1 ms87.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.0 ms36.4 ms100.1 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency105.2 ms81.6 ms128.1 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.34 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0006,613
Unsupported0000
Samples38,55238,91637,9647,936

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.9points

  • Latency+13.1
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +12.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.2points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.0
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time