Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-28 04:13:52 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Tenderly |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 99.4 | 99.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent |
| Availability | 99.95% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.4 ms | 18.2 ms |
| p95 latency | 30.0 ms | 31.5 ms |
| p99 latency | 56.3 ms | 54.5 ms |
| Correctness | 99.96% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.47 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 8,561 | 8,492 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsTenderly
+0.3points
- Latency+0.3
- Head freshness−0.0
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.