Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:06:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.496.492.278.5
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.96%99.93%99.98%
p50 latency19.0 ms19.8 ms33.8 ms106.7 ms
p95 latency34.9 ms51.8 ms71.8 ms196.0 ms
p99 latency74.4 ms759.0 ms169.5 ms243.3 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0064517,567
Unsupported000215
Samples110,118109,276107,46225,321

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.0points

  • Latency+3.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+7.2points

  • Latency+7.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.9points

  • Latency+21.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time