Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:32:27 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCNodeReal
Rank1234
Score99.499.390.686.4
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.97%99.91%100.00%
p50 latency19.3 ms18.6 ms34.2 ms87.2 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms35.6 ms71.5 ms100.3 ms
p99 latency123.6 ms75.2 ms177.2 ms128.7 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.34 blocks
Rate limited001570
Unsupported0000
Samples38,09338,44237,51137,516

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.1points

  • Latency+0.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.8points

  • Latency+8.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.0points

  • Latency+13.1
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time