Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:13:39 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.499.390.758.2
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%99.91%74.93%
p50 latency19.3 ms18.6 ms34.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms35.6 ms71.1 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency122.4 ms74.9 ms176.6 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.38 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited001546,449
Unsupported0000
Samples37,58437,93237,0107,745

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.1points

  • Latency+0.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability+0.0

The parts add to +0.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.7points

  • Latency+8.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.2points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.0
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time