Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:14:37 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1267
Score99.499.070.069.4
StatusExcellentExcellentDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%99.98%100.00%99.91%
p50 latency19.1 ms18.5 ms105.3 ms119.6 ms
p95 latency31.6 ms32.8 ms194.3 ms208.4 ms
p99 latency66.6 ms105.3 ms228.0 ms227.8 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.61 blocks0.42 blocks
Rate limited001,3321
Unsupported00140
Samples8,5558,4821,9358,472

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.4points

  • Latency+0.4
  • Availability+0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+29.4points

  • Latency+29.2
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+30.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +30.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time