Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:20:08 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Tenderly | MEV Blocker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Score | 99.4 | 93.3 | 78.2 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.96% | 99.88% |
| p50 latency | 18.3 ms | 19.9 ms | 118.5 ms |
| p95 latency | 33.7 ms | 74.3 ms | 209.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 70.5 ms | 883.6 ms | 233.5 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.51 blocks | 0.40 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 85,986 | 85,344 | 85,190 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsTenderly
+6.1points
- Latency+6.0
- Head freshness+0.0
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +6.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
PublicNodevsMEV Blocker
+21.2points
- Latency+21.3
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +21.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.