Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 05:39:23 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.494.793.062.5
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.97%99.97%99.93%85.27%
p50 latency18.2 ms19.8 ms33.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency33.5 ms63.2 ms72.0 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency69.9 ms844.3 ms168.3 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0058215,842
Unsupported0000
Samples93,04892,33990,81419,558

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+4.7points

  • Latency+4.7
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+6.4points

  • Latency+6.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+36.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +36.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time