Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:37:04 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkle1RPC
Rank1268
Score99.494.279.062.6
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.96%99.98%85.50%
p50 latency18.3 ms19.9 ms106.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms68.1 ms196.0 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency70.4 ms863.5 ms243.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.51 blocks0.46 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0014,36315,276
Unsupported001770
Samples89,71789,04220,63218,906

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+5.2points

  • Latency+5.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.4points

  • Latency+20.4
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +20.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+36.8points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +36.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time