Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 05:54:32 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1278
Score99.494.877.962.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.97%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency18.2 ms19.8 ms118.4 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency33.5 ms62.8 ms209.2 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency69.8 ms841.7 ms232.8 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited00215,907
Unsupported0000
Samples93,45892,74792,57419,634

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+4.6points

  • Latency+4.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+36.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +36.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time