Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-28 16:10:07 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Score | 99.4 | 86.7 | 82.3 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| p50 latency | 19.7 ms | 35.7 ms | 87.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 33.8 ms | 76.4 ms | 99.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 82.9 ms | 176.8 ms | 125.5 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.36 blocks | 0.35 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 42 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 8,398 | 8,222 | 8,234 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+12.7points
- Latency+12.8
- Head freshness−0.2
- Correctness−0.0
- Availability+0.0
The parts add to +12.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+17.0points
- Latency+17.2
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +17.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.