Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 3.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-28 14:26:48 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Score | 98.3 | 91.0 | 61.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.94% | 83.16% |
| p50 latency | 19.6 ms | 33.7 ms | 265.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 41.1 ms | 72.9 ms | 4975.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 592.1 ms | 174.9 ms | 8455.9 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 97.38% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.36 blocks | 0.91 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 707 | 24,966 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 145,493 | 143,095 | 30,369 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+7.3points
- Latency+7.4
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +7.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
Tenderlyvs1RPC
+36.6points
- Latency+28.9
- Availability+6.7
- Correctness+0.5
- Head freshness+0.5
The parts add to +36.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.