Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-28 11:55:39 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | Merkle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Score | 99.4 | 87.2 | 69.8 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.9 ms | 33.8 ms | 105.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.6 ms | 69.9 ms | 196.1 ms |
| p99 latency | 71.3 ms | 164.6 ms | 238.8 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.51 blocks | 0.35 blocks | 0.65 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 260 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Samples | 1,603 | 1,573 | 387 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+12.1points
- Latency+12.3
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +12.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMerkle
+29.6points
- Latency+29.4
- Head freshness+0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +29.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.