Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 3.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-28 16:10:27 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Score | 98.3 | 90.9 | 86.8 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.94% | 99.85% |
| p50 latency | 19.7 ms | 33.8 ms | 87.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 40.8 ms | 73.1 ms | 100.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 580.6 ms | 175.0 ms | 128.7 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.36 blocks | 0.34 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 745 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 148,309 | 145,837 | 145,763 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+7.4points
- Latency+7.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +7.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+11.5points
- Latency+11.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +11.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.