Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-28 11:56:32 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal | Merkle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Score | 99.4 | 80.0 | 69.5 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.99% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.8 ms | 87.6 ms | 107.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.8 ms | 108.8 ms | 202.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 61.3 ms | 160.8 ms | 250.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.48 blocks | 0.34 blocks | 0.56 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 1,580 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| Samples | 9,627 | 9,477 | 2,258 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+19.4points
- Latency+19.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +19.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMerkle
+29.9points
- Latency+29.8
- Head freshness+0.1
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.