Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 3.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-28 11:54:45 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Score | 98.1 | 86.9 | 61.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.84% | 83.21% |
| p50 latency | 19.6 ms | 87.4 ms | 265.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 41.7 ms | 100.1 ms | 4975.4 ms |
| p99 latency | 607.2 ms | 128.7 ms | 8455.9 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 97.38% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.34 blocks | 0.91 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 24,251 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 141,381 | 138,976 | 29,549 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+11.3points
- Latency+11.4
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +11.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
Tenderlyvs1RPC
+36.5points
- Latency+28.7
- Availability+6.7
- Correctness+0.5
- Head freshness+0.5
The parts add to +36.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.