Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-28 12:27:03 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | PublicNode |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 99.3 | 98.4 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent |
| Availability | 99.94% | 99.88% |
| p50 latency | 19.2 ms | 21.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.9 ms | 35.9 ms |
| p99 latency | 63.5 ms | 68.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.94% | 99.88% |
| Head lag | 0.52 blocks | 0.54 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,594 | 1,610 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsPublicNode
+1.0points
- Latency+0.9
- Head freshness+0.0
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +1.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.