Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-28 01:33:11 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 4 |
| Score | 99.4 | 86.3 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 100.00% | 99.97% |
| p50 latency | 18.7 ms | 87.2 ms |
| p95 latency | 31.9 ms | 98.8 ms |
| p99 latency | 54.2 ms | 115.9 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 99.97% |
| Head lag | 0.46 blocks | 0.34 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,005 | 8,834 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+13.2points
- Latency+13.3
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +13.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.