Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-28 13:24:09 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Score | 99.4 | 89.6 | 86.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 99.99% | 99.98% | 99.90% |
| p50 latency | 18.8 ms | 33.2 ms | 87.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.3 ms | 76.1 ms | 100.2 ms |
| p99 latency | 57.0 ms | 195.3 ms | 137.4 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.47 blocks | 0.37 blocks | 0.34 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 62 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 37,918 | 37,311 | 37,277 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+9.8points
- Latency+10.0
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +9.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+13.3points
- Latency+13.4
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +13.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.