Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-28 09:05:57 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | PublicNode |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 99.4 | 99.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent |
| Availability | 99.94% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.3 ms | 20.9 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.7 ms | 34.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 59.8 ms | 70.2 ms |
| Correctness | 99.94% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.45 blocks | 0.45 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,616 | 1,633 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsPublicNode
+0.4points
- Latency+0.4
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
- Head freshness−0.0
The parts add to +0.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.