Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-28 22:36:25 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal | Merkle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Score | 99.4 | 81.0 | 70.9 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.5 ms | 86.8 ms | 105.1 ms |
| p95 latency | 31.9 ms | 99.2 ms | 181.9 ms |
| p99 latency | 57.1 ms | 112.6 ms | 231.6 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.46 blocks | 0.33 blocks | 0.50 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 270 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Samples | 1,605 | 1,572 | 380 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+18.4points
- Latency+18.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +18.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMerkle
+28.6points
- Latency+28.5
- Head freshness+0.0
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +28.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.