Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-28 21:12:33 UTC
| Metric | Cloudflare | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 8 | 9 |
| Score | 47.9 | 0.0 |
| Status | Poor | Poor |
| Availability | 23.50% | 0.00% |
| p50 latency | 13.7 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 90.0 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 267.5 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | not measured |
| Head lag | no cohort | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 5 | 275 |
| Unsupported | 49 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,615 | 315 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Cloudflare, the highest scorer of those selected.
Cloudflarevs1RPC
+47.9points
- Correctness*+22.2
- Latency*+15.2
- Availability+10.4
- Head freshness+0.0
The parts add to +47.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.