Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-28 15:51:57 UTC
| Metric | NodeReal | Merkle | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 4 | 7 | 9 |
| Score | 82.1 | 69.4 | 0.0 |
| Status | Good | Degraded | Poor |
| Availability | 99.99% | 100.00% | 0.00% |
| p50 latency | 87.4 ms | 109.5 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 99.4 ms | 209.6 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 123.7 ms | 332.7 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% | not measured |
| Head lag | 0.35 blocks | 0.51 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 1,518 | 1,635 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,341 | 2,166 | 1,879 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against NodeReal, the highest scorer of those selected.
NodeRealvsMerkle
+12.7points
- Latency+12.5
- Head freshness+0.2
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +12.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
NodeRealvs1RPC
+82.1points
- Availability+40.0
- Correctness*+20.0
- Latency*+12.5
- Head freshness*+9.6
The parts add to +82.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.