Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:58:04 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkleCloudflare
Rank1269
Score99.495.878.554.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.96%99.98%23.11%
p50 latency18.7 ms19.8 ms106.5 ms15.0 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms55.2 ms196.3 ms87.2 ms
p99 latency72.4 ms787.3 ms243.5 ms250.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.48 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0016,76196
Unsupported002033,061
Samples104,987104,18924,149104,013

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.6points

  • Latency+3.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.9points

  • Latency+20.9
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+44.5points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+7.6
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +44.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time