Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:35:42 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeMEV BlockerCloudflare
Rank1278
Score99.494.969.545.9
StatusExcellentExcellentDegradedPoor
Availability99.98%100.00%99.90%23.09%
p50 latency20.3 ms25.5 ms125.1 ms17.6 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms50.5 ms217.4 ms106.6 ms
p99 latency66.0 ms112.8 ms242.6 ms262.0 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0000
Unsupported000269
Samples9,0729,1429,0379,077

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.5points

  • Latency+4.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsCloudflare

+53.5points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+16.6
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +53.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time