Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:32:32 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMEV Blocker1RPCCloudflare
Rank1789
Score99.476.957.853.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%99.93%73.97%23.15%
p50 latency19.3 ms121.2 ms2024.4 ms15.1 ms
p95 latency33.9 ms212.5 ms6590.4 ms86.6 ms
p99 latency75.5 ms235.2 ms9196.2 ms246.3 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%96.63%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.95 blocksno cohort
Rate limited036,54636
Unsupported0001,121
Samples38,10538,0557,85938,155

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.5points

  • Latency+22.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.6points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.4
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsCloudflare

+45.9points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+9.0
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +45.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time