Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:53:30 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | 1RPC | Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Score | 99.4 | 57.8 | 53.2 |
| Status | Excellent | Degraded | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.98% | 73.97% | 23.16% |
| p50 latency | 19.3 ms | 2024.4 ms | 15.1 ms |
| p95 latency | 34.1 ms | 6590.4 ms | 87.3 ms |
| p99 latency | 77.2 ms | 9196.2 ms | 214.9 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 96.63% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.95 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 6,637 | 55 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 1,138 |
| Samples | 38,653 | 7,969 | 38,664 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
Tenderlyvs1RPC
+41.6points
- Latency+30.0
- Availability+10.4
- Correctness+0.7
- Head freshness+0.5
The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsCloudflare
+46.2points
- Availability+29.7
- Head freshness*+9.4
- Latency+9.3
- Correctness−2.2
The parts add to +46.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.