Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
7d window · 3.0 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 21:19:19 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 9 |
| Score | 97.2 | 54.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.97% | 23.11% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 15.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 48.0 ms | 89.6 ms |
| p99 latency | 714.1 ms | 253.7 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 96 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 3,464 |
| Samples | 117,726 | 117,547 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsCloudflare
+43.1points
- Availability+29.7
- Head freshness*+9.4
- Latency+6.2
- Correctness−2.2
The parts add to +43.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.