Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:33:47 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | Blast API |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Score | 98.6 | 87.9 | 78.0 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 100.00% | 99.95% | 99.99% |
| p50 latency | 18.4 ms | 31.3 ms | 103.7 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.0 ms | 63.4 ms | 117.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 70.8 ms | 157.3 ms | 145.3 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.47 blocks | 0.37 blocks | 0.42 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 35 | 90 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,004 | 8,855 | 9,002 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+10.7points
- Latency+10.8
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +10.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsBlast API
+20.5points
- Latency+20.6
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +20.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.