Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
7d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:22:48 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | Merkle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Score | 96.3 | 92.2 | 78.5 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.93% | 99.98% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 33.9 ms | 106.7 ms |
| p95 latency | 52.6 ms | 72.0 ms | 195.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 765.5 ms | 169.6 ms | 243.2 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.36 blocks | 0.48 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 645 | 17,359 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 212 |
| Samples | 108,101 | 106,319 | 25,023 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+4.1points
- Latency+4.3
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +4.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMerkle
+17.8points
- Latency+17.9
- Head freshness−0.0
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +17.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.